Share in Global Trade by Region, 1980-2011 (Source: Le Goff and Singh 2013)
There are particularly untapped gains from Africa trading within itself.
African countries are currently losing out on billions of dollars in
potential trade earnings every year because of high trade barriers with
its neighbors. As stated out in the De-fragmenting Africa report, it is easier for Africa to trade with the rest of the world than with itself.
This must change.
Trade can lift people out of extreme poverty in several ways. Besides
immediate gains from de-fragmenting through regional integration,
consider that the relatively abundant unskilled labor force may benefit
from higher demand if countries can leverage a comparative advantage in
producing labor intensive goods. Freer trade can also enhance the
incentives for investment, provide economies of scale, enhance
competition in detriment of rent-seeking activities created by trade
restrictions, and open the way for technology transfer from abroad.
Notice that I said “trade can reduce poverty”. As Maelan Le Goff and Raju Jan Singh noted in a recent Economic Premise - Can Trade Reduce Poverty in Africa?
– most analysts recognize that, in the long run, open economies exhibit
a better performance overall than closed ones, with development
benefitting from relatively open policies. Nonetheless, they highlight, “for
comparative advantage to increase the incomes of unskilled workers,
workers need to be able to move out of shrinking sectors and into
expanding ones”. If there are too many barriers to labor mobility
and the entry and exit for firms, the potential for poverty-reducing
impacts of trade may remain untapped.
Another challenge to consider is when the demand for labor generated
by trade does not match the local availability of unskilled labor , and
production processes turn to more skilled labor and imported
equipments. This can create dualistic structures in the local economy.
Natural-resource abundance may also tilt local comparative advantages
toward non-labor intensive sectors.
The authors see a way forward: highlighting the need of complementary
reforms to allow a bigger poverty-reduction bang from the trade buck.
They report results from a research with 30 African countries showing
how deepening local financial sectors, raising education levels, and
strengthening governance facilitate the reallocation of resources from
less productive sectors to more productive ones – the essence of the transition of an economy from low- to middle-income levels:
“A more developed financial sector, as measured by the private
sector credit-to-GDP ratio, allows banks and investors to quickly
identify new and promising sectors and to redirect credit. A more
educated population, as measured by primary completion rates, would be
more able to acquire the new skills sought by growing sectors and adjust
more rapidly to the new conditions of the labor market. Finally, better
governance, as measured by the rule of law, would facilitate the
entering into and dissolution of contracts and make conflict resolution
easier.”
Their research also finds that many African countries already meet
the thresholds of financial deepening and levels of education above
which the impacts of trade tend to be positive, while institutional
strengthening has relatively more room to grow. Special attention should
be given to countries currently below those thresholds. After all,
adequate policies and institutions, human capital, and a financial
system capable of transferring resources are in themselves favorable to
poverty-reduction efforts in Africa and elsewhere, and gains from trade
are just one of the factors.
0 comments:
POST A COMMENT